|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Special offer: buy AmiBroker and EOD+Real-Time Data |
|
* To: RealTraders Discussion Group * Subject: A variation of Williams' %R * From: "Rajat K. Bose" * Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 06:02:17 PDT * Reply-To: rajatkbose@xxxxxxxxxxx * Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx List members, Given below is an indicator, which is a variation of William's %R, used by me in MetaStock 6.52. The structure of the indicator is similar to that of Willams' %R. All I have done here is to substitute High and Low of any bar with that of Bollinger Band Top and Bollinger Band Bottom. I have tested it on various time periods (for Bollinger Bands) using 2 std.dev., it sometimes gives an early indication of reversals than the Williams' %R of the same period. Divergences have also been somewhat better. However, the structure shows that most of its properties are similar to that of Williams' %R or for that matter any other overbought-oversoldindicator. Any comments, criticisms and/or suggestions in this regard would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Rajat K Bose Rajat.... I have not yet tried your code so I have NO IDEA whether your indicator has a scintilla of value BUT.... imho this is EXACTLY the type of experimentation that has to be done on a never-ending basis in order to improve your trading. You may have to go through 50 indicators like this to find one that will improve your trading by a half-tick on average..... but those half ticks add up to real money :) Code:
all formulas for MetaStock all formulas
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| However we try to maintain hiqhest possible level of service - most formulas, oscillators, indicators and systems are submitted by anonymous users. Therefore S4T™ does not take any responsibility for it's quality. If you use any of this information, use it at your own risk. You are responsible for your own trading decisions. Be sure to verify that any information you see on these pages is correct, and is applicable to your particular trade. In no case will S4T™ be responsible for your trading gains or losses. |
|
|