log in     sign up for free
 
In my opinion, you do not have a trading system unless you know exactly when you will get out of the market position at the time you enter it.
Van K. Tharp
 
 
Home
systems (284)
 
Special offer: buy AmiBroker and EOD+Real-Time Data
 

Buy

MetaStock

     (special offer)
 
 
 

Buy

EOD data for MetaStock

     (special offer)
 
 
 

Buy

Realtime data for MetaStock

     (special offer)
 
 
 
Formula Library
 
AmiBroker
MetaTrader
MetaStock
TradeStation
Wealth-Lab
NinjaTrader
 
add your formula
System Library
 
 
Account login
Your email:
Password:
 
Log in
New to s4t? Sign up.
If you forgot your password click here.
Search the Web
 
Custom Search

OBV Exploration

Formula for: MetaStock

exploration


 

 

Views:  2045

Added: November 22, 2007
 
Rate this code:  Rate: 1 Rate: 2 Rate: 3 Rate: 4 Rate: 5
This formula has not been rated yet
 

email this link

 
 
Tags: MetaStock, exploration
 
Your Ad Here
obv formula
To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: obv formula
From: surfingrincon@xxxxxxxx (jeff f brady)
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 23:43:15 PST
Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 18:28:51 -0600
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-Message-Id: <"hvsQ63.0.Ur4.29fPp"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

hi group,

I am trying to come up with a explorations that finds a security laggingbehind its (on balance volume). I am using daily data. This would indicate that more buying volume is coming in to the security then selling volumes and that the security should eventually break to the upside.

This is what I have come up with so far: any comments/ suggestions?

ts not turning up all lot of prospects, as a matter of fact I believe compact (cpq) is the kind of security/obv relationship I am looking for but my exploration does not tag it as a candidate.

The exploration is looking for a OBV reading today that is greater than any obv in the last 25 days.

The close today is less than the highest close in the last 65 days times75%. So the close today is less than 75% of the greatest high in thelast 65 days. Why? If I ran the exploration to find a close todaylower than the lowest close in the last 65 days I was coming up with downtrendingstocks that seemed to be real dogs. Why 25 days on the obv and 65 on thesecurity? I am trying to emulate a recent pattern in compact computers.

I also added in that the close today should be above its 50 day moving average. hopefully this finds candidates that are in an uptrend rather than a downtrend.

I have yet to system test it on any securities, hopefully some time thisweek.

As a side, looks like 1200 is key support on the NASD, if it breaks it could get ugly! (my opinion any way.)

JB

 

 



Code:

OBV Exploration

col a:
obv()

col b:
ref(hhv(obv(),25),-1)

col c:
c

col d:
(ref(hhv(c,65,-1))*(.75)

flitr:
when(cola,>,colb) and when(colc,<,cold) and when(c,>mov(c,50,e))


 





Source: http://purebytes.com/archives/metastock/

 

View similar (exploration for MetaStock):

52 Week Hi-Lo Exploration
Red-Green Strategy
RSI Bullish & Bearish Divergence Exploration
RS vs. S&P500 Exploration
TRIX Explorer
Performance Daily
Price and Volume Breakout
Checks the %Profit Gained
Dynamic Zone Williams%R Exploration
Pivot-Point Strategy
...
 
 
all formulas for MetaStock
all formulas

 

 

Email to friend

Top

 

     
However we try to maintain hiqhest possible level of service - most formulas, oscillators, indicators
and systems are submitted by anonymous users.
Therefore S4T™ does not take any responsibility for it's quality.
If you use any of this information, use it at your own risk. You are responsible for your own trading decisions.
Be sure to verify that any information you see on these pages is correct, and is applicable to your particular trade.
In no case will S4T™ be responsible for your trading gains or losses.
 
Privacy note | (c) copyrights systems4trading.com 2006-2012